>>452

Hahaha, didn't think anyone got time to see it. Nice idea or terrible? You decide.

>>452

Also, the amount of screen caps you have... I'm scared they will be used against me to show me really being a moron. Like I delete a board by accident or give out my tripcode.

Don't mess up Emee... Don't mess up.




Emee#ilLoveDaiki

>>453

Heh. I was actually going to reply, but the board disappeared by the time I hit submit. :v

>>454

Haha. Actually, I'm pretty sure I only have one other screenshot that includes one or more of your posts (>>/doujin/5912).

>>455

I will put the board up again if WC goes down like last time. Since it seems a few people don't like the new moderation, seems likely that might happen. Either way, interesting idea :3

Also you NEED to start a thread of memorable/interesting screencaps you have. Very interested to see some!

I heard the new site admin(s?) went psychotic and deleted everything and drove away the userbase, did they revert?

Drama like this is seldom worth following unless you have a personal stake in it IMO, but.. (no real idea what happened or why)

Nice to see you back Emee.
A critter board might not be a terrible idea actually...just as long as we don't have to be nazi's about whether something is 'critter' enough to be on the board.

>>459

If enough people want the board and use it, then it would be a welcome edition.

As a migrant from WC myself, I'd have to say that an alternative place to post critter art would, at least for me, may be quite welcome--perhaps not immediately, but in the forseeable future. WC is pretty much ripping itself to shreds right now, so a drama-free alternative would be wonderful. The only problem is, a very large portion of critter art is loli/shota, which is against the current rules for posting. Would an exception be given for such a board?

>>470

ponoiro has confirmed that furry shota/loli is fine.

I suppose front page rules need to be updated as Trump's commercial works are also no-post now...